|
Permission
to Republish: This article may
be republished in newsletters and on websites provided attribution is
provided to the author and it appears with the included copyright,
resource box and live website link. E-mail
notice of intent is appreciated, but not required:
(mail to: PETGATE@aol.com)
Pre-formatted to 60-65 characters width |
|
Article Description: Discussion of Bible evidence on whether animals have souls or not.
Title of Article:
"The Souls of Animals"
At some point in
our lives, we have all lost precious and dear pets, or at least know
someone who has. Their passing
is often as painful to us as when we lose human loved ones, sometimes even
more so. When they leave us,
we like to think that there is a place for them in eternity.
It is important that we feel that somehow, someway, provision has
been made for them. Unfortunately,
when we seek validation for these hopes from those we look to in spiritual
matters, we frequently find that they hold to the view that animals are
for this world only and that they do not possess eternal souls.
We are told that when they pass, that is the end of the road for
them. This only deepens our
sorrow and pain. I do not
subscribe to this view. In
fact, I find it to be both presumptuous and theologically immature.
Presumptuous, because the Bible is clear that God valued the
creatures he formed with his own hands and called them "very
good" after creating them, indicating that their existence pleased
him. Further, the
Bible gives indisputable record that God, motivated by his pleasure and
love for his creation, personally and purposely protects and provides for
his creatures from Eden past through Millennium future. We are told that
he clothes the animals and provides sustenance for them.
He directs their migrations to ensure their safety from the
environment. He even gives
instructions on how domestic animals should be treated.
In short, he expresses and employs unending care for his creatures. This should come as no surprise to anyone as it is in keeping with his original plan in Eden, which was that animals (like humans) would live forever. His immutability precludes variance from that plan; irrespective of the temporary setback caused by the fall of mankind. It would be presumptuous to think that God would change his mind on this matter, for his thoughts and plans are perfect and never in need of correction, change or update. Continuing, the
evidence found in scripture overwhelmingly supports that animals do indeed
have souls, much like people. I
say "much like" because there is a distinct difference.
Animals are innocent creatures that are not in need of
reconciliation and regeneration.
Nevertheless, with this one exception, their souls are very similar
to, if not exactly like our own. In perhaps the
oldest book of the Bible, the Book of Job, verse 10 of chapter 12 tells us
"In whose hand is the soul of every living thing".
This is a very profound passage.
The initial, face-value perception is that God is speaking of all
creatures, human and animal. The considered, in-depth study of the
statement supports the initial perception.
He is speaking of all creatures, human and animal. The word "soul" is used in over
twenty different ways in the Bible. Invariably,
when people come across this word in scripture, they automatically
associate it with redemption, so much so that in no matter what context it
appears, the connection to reconciliation and salvation is always present
in their minds and unconsciously applied to the interpretation.
In most cases, this is right and acceptable
to the rules of exegesis, but there are times when it is not.
Clearly, the gospel message is not for animals.
It is exclusively for people. It
is a reconciliatory outreach from God to people.
However, to allow this truth to cause one to draw the conclusion
that an animal therefore cannot have a soul, is to visit a gross injustice
on scripture. The Hebrew word "nephesh" (soul),
appears many times in scripture and is used interchangeably to describe
both the essence of man and animals. It
does not make a distinction between the two and it does not delve into
salvation in its application. Rather,
it addresses the consciousness of the soul. This passage in Job is a good example of
this. The word soul is not
used in relation to redemption, but rather addresses providential care.
A clearer meaning of this verse would be "in whose hand is the
life or essence of every living thing…".
God is speaking of that part of humans and animals that contains or
houses the "life" he has given to them, that part that departs
the body when the body expires. Revelation
16:3 can be singled out to show that animals have this essence.
Here the Bible says "every living
soul", using the Greek word "psuche", a close relative to
"nephesh". The
passage speaks of every living soul in the sea dying.
Unless we believe in mermaids and mermen, the passage can only be
referring to animals and assigning them an immortal soul. When we mesh these thoughts in Job and
Revelation with Romans chapter 8 and Revelation 5:9-13, to name a few
corresponding passages, the meaning is clear.
The life or essence of every living thing is in the eternal care of
the one who created that life. However, this word in Job indicates an even
deeper thought for us to consider. We
often refer to man (or woman) as a flesh and blood body with a soul.
This is not so. In
keeping with the absolute intent of this word, man is a soul that has been
placed in a flesh and blood body. The distinction is subtle, but it is
immense in effect. This is our essence, that we are a soul, not a body.
The body is temporal, but the soul eternal.
|
|
The author, Gary Kurz, helps those grieving the loss of a
pet to understand the Biblical evidence that proves they live on.
His most popular book, "Cold Noses at the Pearly Gates"
delivers hope and comfort to the reader in a very gentle, yet convincing
way. Visit at www.coldnosesbook.com
for more information, tips and gifts or write to |